ica with the infomax technique Search Results


90
InfoMax Inc ica technique
Ica Technique, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pmc09958593-165-0-32?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica technique - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica signal processing technique
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica Signal Processing Technique, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pmc02932458-100-7-14?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica signal processing technique - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica based on the infomax optimizationlearning algorithm
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica Based On The Infomax Optimizationlearning Algorithm, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm23891885-79-17-5?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica based on the infomax optimizationlearning algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc gpuoptimized version of the infomax independent component analysis (ica)
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Gpuoptimized Version Of The Infomax Independent Component Analysis (Ica), supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm31648002-180-30-30?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gpuoptimized version of the infomax independent component analysis (ica) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc de-mixing matrix obtained from the infomax ica algorithm
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
De Mixing Matrix Obtained From The Infomax Ica Algorithm, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm24043206-288-12-17?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
de-mixing matrix obtained from the infomax ica algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica based on the extended
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica Based On The Extended, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/ppr0243067-193-12-17?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica based on the extended - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc spatial ica implemented on gift toolbox using the infomax neural net program
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Spatial Ica Implemented On Gift Toolbox Using The Infomax Neural Net Program, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm34906884-504-7-14?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial ica implemented on gift toolbox using the infomax neural net program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica on the pca-compressed eeg and eog data using the extended infomax algorithm
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica On The Pca Compressed Eeg And Eog Data Using The Extended Infomax Algorithm, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pmc06127278-329-13-13?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica on the pca-compressed eeg and eog data using the extended infomax algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc bss-ica method using the infomax algorithm
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Bss Ica Method Using The Infomax Algorithm, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm25284302-256-16-15?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bss-ica method using the infomax algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc vlsi chip of the extend infomax independent component analysis (ica) algorithm
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Vlsi Chip Of The Extend Infomax Independent Component Analysis (Ica) Algorithm, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/10__1109_slash_tbcas__2020__2974049-0-9-17?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vlsi chip of the extend infomax independent component analysis (ica) algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica algorithm runica function of the infomax algorithm implemented in eeglab
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica Algorithm Runica Function Of The Infomax Algorithm Implemented In Eeglab, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm34185222-109-9-15?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica algorithm runica function of the infomax algorithm implemented in eeglab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InfoMax Inc ica based on the kullback-leibler information
(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced <t>by</t> <t>Infomax</t> <t>ICA</t> applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).
Ica Based On The Kullback Leibler Information, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ica+with+the+infomax+technique/pm09804672-159-4-15?v=InfoMax+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica based on the kullback-leibler information - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced by Infomax ICA applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).

Journal:

Article Title: Imaging Brain Dynamics Using Independent Component Analysis

doi: 10.1109/5.939827

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Grand mean evoked response to detected target stimuli in the detection task (average of responses from ten subjects and five attended locations). Response waveform at all 29 scalp channels and two EOG channels are plotted on a common axis. Topographic plots of the scalp distribution of the response at four indicated latencies show that the LPC topography is labile, presumably reflecting the summation at the electrodes of potentials generated by temporally overlapping activations in several brain areas each having broad but topographically fixed projections to the scalp. All scalp maps shown individually scaled to increase color contrast, with polarities at their maximum projection as indicated in the color bar. (b) Activation time courses and scalp maps of the four LPC components produced by Infomax ICA applied to 75 1-s grand-mean (10-Ss) ERPs from both tasks. Map scaling as in (a). The thick dotted line (left) indicates stimulus onset. Mean subject-median response times (RTs) in the Detection task (red) and Discrimination task (blue) are indicated by solid vertical bars. Three independent components (P3f, P3b, Pmp) accounted for 95%–98% of response variance in both tasks. In both tasks, median RT coincided with Pmp onset. The faint vertical dotted line near 250 ms shows that the P3f time courses for targets and “nogo” nontargets (presented in the target location) just at the onset of the left-sided Pnt component, which was active only in this condition. (c) Envelopes of the scalp projections of maximally independent component P3f, (red filled) superimposed on the mean response envelopes (black outlines) for all 5 × 5 response conditions of the Detection task. (d) The top panels show the grand mean target response at two scalp channels, Fz and Pz (thick traces), and the projections of the two largest ICA components, P3b and Pmp, to the same channels (thin traces). The central panel shows a scatter plot of ten average target ERPs at the two electrodes. The data contain two strongly radial (and, therefore, spatially fixed) features. The dashed lines (middle panel) show the directions associated with components P3b and Pmp in these data, as determined by the relative projection strengths of each component to these two scalp channels (shown below as black dots on the component scalp maps). The degree of data entropy attained by ICA training is illustrated by the (center right) plot insert, which shows the (31-channel) scatter-plotted data after logistic transformation and rotation to the two component axes (from [25] by permission).

Article Snippet: First, we will examine an application of ICA to natural images that supports an Infomax-based theory of perceptual brain organization [ 17 ] and also illustrates the nature of independence.

Techniques: Generated, Activation Assay, Produced, Transformation Assay